Reference
Stones of Venice Chapter IV
The Stones of Venice vol. II
from vol. II:
Chapter 4: "St. Mark"
John Ruskin
| from The Stones of Venice vol II. Chapter IV - St. Mark. §xxx-xlvii; lxxi |
| § xxx. LAW I. That the
phlinths and cornices used for binding the armor are to
be light and delicate. A certain thickness, at least
two or three inches, must be required in the covering
pieces (even when composed of the strongest stone, and
set on the least exposed parts), in order to prevent the
chance of fracture, and to allow for the wear of time.
And the weight of this armor must not be trusted to
cement ; the pieces must not be merely glued to the rough
brick surface, but connected with the mass which they
protect by binding cornices and string courses ; and with
each other, so as to secure mutual support, aided by the
rivetings, but by no means dependent upon them. And, for
the full honesty and straightforwardness of the work, it
is necessary that these string courses and binding
plinths should not be of such proportions as would fit
them for taking any important part in the hard work of
the inner structure, or render them liable to he mistaken
for the great cornices and plinths already explained as
essential parts of the best solid building. They must be
delicate, slight, and 'visibly incapable of severer work
than that assigned to them. § xxxi LAW II. Science of inner structure is to be abandoned. As the body of the structure is confessedly of inferior, and comparatively incoherent materials, it would be absurd to at-tempt in it any expression of the higher refinements of con-struction. It will be enough that by its mass we are assured of its sufficiency and strength; and there is the less reason for endeavoring to diminish the extent of its surface by delicacy of adjustment, because on the breadth of that surface we are to depend for the better display of the color, which is to be the chief source of our pleasure in the building. The main body of the work, therefore, will be composed of solid walls and massive piers ; and whatever expression of finer structural science we may require, will he thrown either into subordinate portions 9f it, or entirely directed to the support of the external mail, where in arches or vaults it might otherwise appear dangerously independent of the material within. § xxxii LAW III All shafts are to he solid. Wherever, by the smallness of the parts, we may be driven to abandon the in-crusted structure at all, it must be abandoned altogether . The eye must never be left in the least doubt as to what is solid and what is coated. Whatever appears probably solid, must be assuredly so, and therefore it becomes an inviolable law that no shaft shall ever be incrusted. Not only does the whole virtue of a shaft depend on its consolidation but the labor of cutting and adjusting an incrusted coat to it would be greater than the saving of material is worth Therefore the shaft of what ever size, is always to be solid and because the incrusted character of the rest of the building renders it more difficult for the shafts to clear themselves from suspicion they must not, in this incrusted style, be in any place jointed. No shaft must ever he used but of one block ; and this the more, because the permission given to the builder to have his walls and piers as ponderous as he likes, renders it quite unnecessary for him to use shafts of any fixed size. In our Norman and Gothic, where definite support is required at a definite point, it be comes lawful to build up a tower of small stones in the shape of a shaft. But the Byzantine is allowed to have as much sup port as he wants from the walls in every direction, and he has no right to ask for further license in the structure of his shafts. Let him, by generosity in the substance of his pillars, repay us for the permission we have given him to be superficial in his walls. The builder in the chalk valleys of France and Eng-land may be blameless in kneading his clumsy pier out of broken flint and calcined lime ; but the Venetian, who has access to the riches of Asia and the quarries of Egypt, must trains at least his shafts out of flawless stone. § xxxiii. And this for another reason yet. Although, as we have said, it is impossible to cover the walls of a large. building with color, except on the condition of dividing the stone into plates, there is always a certain appearance of mean-ness and niggardliness in the procedure. It is necessary that the builder should justify himself from this suspicion ; and prove that it is not in mere economy or poverty, but in the real impossibility of doing otherwise, that has sheeted his walls so thinly with the precious film. Now the shaft is exactly the portion of the edifice in which it is fittest to recover his honor in this respect. For if blocks of jasper or porphyry be inserted in the walls, the spectator cannot tell their thickness, and cannot judge of the costliness of the sacrifice. But the shaft he can measure with his eye in an instant, and esti-mate the quantity of treasure both in the mass of its existing substance, and in that which has been hewn away to bring it into its perfect and symmetrical form. And thus the shafts of all buildings of this kind are justly regarded as an expres-sion of their wealth, and a form of treasure, just as much as the jewels or gold in the sacred vessels ; they are, in fact, nothing else than large jewels,* the block of precious serpen-tine or jasper being valued according to its size and brilliancy of color, like a large emerald or ruby; only the bulk required to bestow value on the one is to be measured in feet and tons, and on the other in lines and carats. The shafts must there-fore be, without exception, of one block in all buildings of this kind ; for the attempt in any place to incrust or joint them would he a deception like that of introducing a false stone among jewellery (for a number of joints of any precious stone are of course not equal in value to a single piece of equal weight), and would put an end at once to the spectator's confidence in the expression of wealth in any portion of the structure, or of the spirit of sacrifice in those who raised it. xxxiv. Law IV. The shafts may sometimes he independ-ent of the construction. Exactly in proportion to the impor-tance which the shaft assumes as a large jewel, is the diminu-tion of its importance as a sustaining member; for the delight which we receive in its abstract bulk, and beauty of color, is altogether independent of any perception of its adaptation to mechanical necessities. Like other beautiful things in this * " Quivi presso Si vedi una colouna di tanta hellezza e finezza che e riputato piutosto gioia che pietra." - Sansovino, of the verd-antique pillar in San Jacomo dell' Orio. A remarkable piece of natural history and moral philosophy, connected with this subject, will be found in the second chapter of our third volume, quoted from the work of a Florentine architect of the fifteenth century world. its end is to he beautiful; and, in proportion to its beauty, it receives permission to be otherwise useless. We do not blame emeralds and rubies because we cannot make -them into heads of hammers Nay so far from our admiration of the jewel shaft being dependent on its doing work for us, it is very possible that a chief part of its preciousness may' consist in a delicacy fragility and tenderness of material which must render it utterly unfit for hard work, and there fore that we shall admire it the more because we perceive that if we were to put much weight upon it, it would be crushed. But, at all events it is very clear that the primal object in the placing of such shafts must be the display of their beauty to the best advantage and that therefore all imbedding of them in walls, or crowding of them into groups, in any position in which either their real size or ally portion of their surface would he concealed, is either inadmissible altogether, or ob-jectionable in proportion to their value; that no symmetrical or scientific arrangements of pillars are therefore ever to be expected in buildings of this kind, and that all such are even to be looked upon as positive errors and misapplications of materials : but that, on the contrary, we must be constantly prepared to see, and to see with admiration, shafts of great size end importance set in places where their real service is little more than nominal, and where the chief end of their ex-istence is to catch the sunshine upon their polished sides, and lead the eye into delighted wandering among the mazes of their azure veins. § xxxv. LAW V. The shafts may be of variable size. Since the value of each shaft depends upon its bulk, and diminishes with the diminution of its mass, in a greater ratio than the size itself diminishes, as in the case of all other jewellery, it is evident that we must not in general expect perfect symmetry and equality among the series of shafts, any more than defi-niteness of application ; but that, on the contrary, an accu-rately observed symmetry ought to give us a kind of pain, as proving that considerable and useless loss has been sustained by some of the shafts, in being cut down to match with the rest. It is true that symmetry is generally sought for in works of smaller jewellery; but, even there, not a perfect symmetry, and obtained under circumstances quite different from those which affect the placing of shafts in architecture. First the symmetry is usually imperfect. The stones that seem to match each other in a ring or necklace, appear to do so only because they are so small that their differences are not easily measured by the eye ; but there is almost always such difference between them as would be strikingly apparent if it existed in the same proportion between two shafts nine or ten feet in height. Secondly: the quantity of stones which pass through a jeweller's hands, and the facility of exchange of such small objects, enable the tradesman to select any num-ber of stones of approximate size; a selection, however, often requiring so much time, that perfect symmetry in a group of very fine stones adds enormously to their value. But the ar-chitect has neither the time nor the facilities of exchange. He cannot lay aside one column in a corner of his church till, in the course of traffic, he obtain another that will match it; he has not hundreds of shafts fastened up in bundles, out of which he can match sizes at his ease; he cannot send to a brother-tradesmen and exchange the useless stones for avail-able ones, to the convenience of both. His blocks of stone, or his ready hewn shafts, have been brought to him in limited number, from immense distances ; no others are to be ha4; and for those which he does not bring into use, there is no demand elsewhere. His only means of obtaining symmetry will therefore be, in cutting down the finer masses to equality with the inferior ones; and this we ought not to desire him often to do. And therefore, while sometimes in a Baldac-chino, or an important chapel or shrine, this costly symmetry may be necessary, and admirable in proportion to its probable cost, in the general fabric we must expect to see shafts intro-duced of size and proportion continually varying, and such symmetry as may be obtained among them never altogether perfect, and dependent for its charm frequently on strange complexities and unexpected rising and falling of weight and accent in its marble syllables ; bearing the same relation to a rigidly chiselled and proportioned architecture that the wild lyric rhythm of Aeschylus or Pindar bears to the finished measures of Pope. § xxxvi. The application of the principles of jewellery to the smaller as well as the larger blocks, will suggest to us another reason for the method of incrustation adopted in the walls. It often happens that the beauty of the veining in some varieties of alabaster is so great, that it becomes desirable to exhibit it .by dividing the stone, not merely to economize its substance, but to display the changes in the disposition of its fantastic lines. By reversing one of two thin plates successively taken from the stone, and placing their corresponding edges in con-.tact, a perfectly symmetrical figure may be obtained, which 'will enable the eye to comprehend more thoroughly the posi-tion of the veins. And this is actually the method in which, .for the most part, the alabasters of St. Mark are employed .thus accomplishing a double good,-directing the spectator, in the first place, to close observation of the nature of the stone employed, and in the second, giving him a farther proof of the honesty of intention in the builder : for wherever simi-lar veining is discovered in two pieces, the fact is declared that they have been cut from the same stone. It would have been easy to disguise the similarity by using them in different .parts of the building; but on the contrary they are set edge to edge, so that the whole system of the architecture may be discovered at a glance by any one acquainted with the nature of the stones employed. Nay, but, it is perhaps answered me, not by an ordinary observer; a person ignorant of the nature .of alabaster might perhaps fancy all these symmetrical pat . terns to have been found in the stone itself, and thus be doubly deceived, supposing blocks to be solid and symmetrical which were in reality subdivided and irregular. I grant it ; but be it remembered, that in all things, ignorance is liable to be deceived, and has no right to accuse anything but itself as the source of the deception. The style and the words are dishonest, not which are liable to be misunderstood if sub-jected to no inquiry,. but which are deliberately calculated to lead inquiry astray. There are perhaps no great or noble truths, from those of religion downwards, which present no mistakeable aspect to casual or ignorant contemplation. Both the truth and the lie agree in hiding themselves at first, but the lie continues to hide itself with effort, as we approach to examine it ; and, leads us, if undiscovered, into deeper lies; the truth reveals itself in proportion to our patience and knowledge, discovers itself kindly to our pleading, and leads us, as it is discovered, into deeper truths. § xxxvii. LAW VI. The decoration must be shallow in cutting. The method of construction being thus systematized, it is evident that, a certain style of decoration must arise out of it, based on the primal condition that over the greater part of the edifice there can be no deep cutting. The thin sheets of covering stones do not admit of it ; we must not Cut them through to the bricks ; and whatever ornaments we engrave upon them cannot, therefore, be more than an inch deep at the utmost Consider for an instant the enormous difference which this single condition compels between the sculptural decoration of the incrusted style, and that of the solid stones of the North which may lie backed and hewn into whatever cavernous hollows and black recesses we choose ; struck into grim darknesses and grotesque projections, and rugged ploughings up of sinuous furrows, in which any form or thought may be wrought out on any scale,-mighty statues with robes of rock and crowned foreheads burning in the sun, or venomous goblins and stealthy dragons shrunk into lurking-places of untraceable shade: think of this, and of the play and freedom given to the sculptor's hand and temper, to smite out, and in, hither and thither, as he will; and then consider what must be the different spirit of the design which is to be wrought on the smooth surface of a film of marble, where every line and shadow must be drawn -with the most tender pencilling and cautious reserve of resource,-where even the chisel must not strike hard, lest it break through the delicate stone, nor the mind be permitted in any impetuosity of conception inconsistent with the fine discipline of the band. Consider that whatever animal or human form is to be suggested must be projected on a flat surface ; that all the features of the countenance, the folds of the drapery, the involutions of the limbs, must be so reduced and subdued that the whole work becomes rather a piece of fine drawing than of sculpture; and then follow out, until you begin to perceive their endlessness, the resulting differences of character which will be necessitated in every part of the ornamental designs of these incrusted churches, as Compared with that of the Northern schools. I shall endeavor to trace a few of them only. § xxxviii. The first would of course be a diminution of the builder's dependence upon human form as a source of ornament : since exactly in proportion to the dignity of the form itself is the loss which it must sustain in being reduced to a shallow and linear bas-relief, as well as the difficulty of expressing it at all under such conditions. Wherever sculpture can be solid, the nobler characters of the human form at once lead the artist to aim at its representation, rather than at that of inferior organisms; but when all is to be reduced to outline, the forms of flowers and lower animals are always more intelligible, and are felt to approach much more to a satisfactory rendering of the objects intended, than the outlines of the human body. This inducement to seek for resources of ornament in the lower fields of creation was powerless in the minds of the great Pagan nations, Ninevite, Greek, or Egyptian : first, because their thoughts were so concentrated on their own capacities and fates, that they preferred the rudest suggestion of human form to the best of an inferior organism -. secondly, because their constant practice in solid sculpture, often colossal, enabled them to bring a vast amount, of science into the treatment of the lines, -whether of the low relief, the monochrome vase, or shallow hieroglyphic. § xxxix. But when various ideas adverse to the representation of animal, and especially of human, form, originating with the Arabs and iconoclast Greeks, had begun at any rate to direct the builders' mind to seek for decorative materials in inferior types, and when diminished practice in solid sculpture had rendered it more difficult to find artists capable of satisfactorily reducing the high organisms to their elementary outlines, the choice of subject for surface sculpture would be more and more uninterruptedly directed to floral organisms, and human and animal form would become diminished in size, frequency, and general importance. So that, while the Northern solid architecture we constantly find the effect of its noblest features dependent on ranges of statues, often colossal, and full of abstract interest, independent of their architectural service, in the Southern incrusted style we must expect to find the human form for the most part subordinate and diminutive, and involved among designs of foliage and flowers, in the manner of which endless examples had been furnished by the fantastic ornamentation of the Romans, from which the incrusted style had been directly derived. § xl. Farther. In proportion to the degree in which his subject must be reduced to abstract outline will be the ten-dency in the sculptor to abandon naturalism of representation, and subordinate every form to architectural service, Where the flower or animal can be hewn into bold relief, there will always be a temptation to render the representation of it more complete than is necessary, or even to introduce details and intricacies inconsistent with simplicity of distant effect. Very often a worse fault than this is commit-ted; and in the endeavor to give vitality to the stone, the original ornamental purpose of the design is sacrificed or for-gotten. But when nothing of this kind can be attempted, and a slight outline is all that the sculptor can command, we may anticipate that this outline will be composed with exquisite grace ; and that the richness of its ornamental arrangement will atone for the feebleness of its power of portraiture. On the porch of a Northern cathedral we may seek for the images of the flowers that grow in the neighboring fields, and as we watch with wonder the grey stones that fret themselves into thorns, and soften into blossoms, we may care little that these knots of ornament, as we retire from them to contemplate the whole building, appear unconsidered or confused. On the incrusted building we must expect no such deception of the eye or thoughts. It may sometimes be difficult to determine, from the involutions of its linear sculpture, what were the natural forms which originally suggested them: but we may confidently expect that the grace of their arrangement will always he complete; that there will not be a line in them which could be taken away without injury, nor one wanting which could be added with advantage. § xli. Farther. While the sculptures of the incrusted school will thus be generally distinguished by care and purity rather than force, and 'will be, for the most part, utterly wanting in depth of shadow, there will be one means of obtaining darkness peculiarly simple and obvious, and often in the sculptor's power. Wherever he can, without danger, leave a hollow behind his covering slabs, or use them, like glass, to fill an aperture in the wall, he can, by piercing them with holes, obtain points or spaces of intense blackness to contrast with the light tracing of the rest of his design. And 'we may expect to find this artifice used the more extensively, because, while it will be an effective means of ornamentation on the exterior of the building, it will be also the safest way of admitting light to the interior, still totally excluding both rain and wind. And it will naturally follow that the archi-tect, thus familiarized with the effect of black and sudden points of shadow, will often seek to carry the same principle into other portions of his ornamentation, and by deep drill-holes, or perhaps inlaid portions of black color, to refresh the eye where it may be wearied by the lightness of the general handling. § xlii. Farther. Exactly in proportion to the degree
in which the force of sculpture is subdued, 'will be the
impor-tance attached to color as a means of effect or
constitu-ent of beauty. I have above stated that the
incrusted style was the only one in which perfect or
permanent color dec-oration was possible. It is also the
only one in which a true system of color decoration was
ever likely to be invented. In order to understand this,
the realer must permit me to re view with some care the
nature of the principles of coloring adopted by the
Northern and Southern nations. Observe, it is not now the question whether our Northern cathedrals are better with color or without. Perhaps the great monotone grey of Nature and of Time is a better color than any that the human hand can give; but that is nothing to our present business. The simple fact is, that the builders of those cathedrals laid upon them the brightest colors they could obtain, and that there is not, as far as I am aware, in Europe, any monument of a truly noble school 'which has not been either painted all over, or vigorously touched 'with paint, mosaic, and gilding in its prominent parts. Thus far Egyp-tians, Greeks, Goths, Arabs, and mediaeval Christians all agree: none of them, when in their right senses, ever think of doing without paint; and therefore, when I said above that the Venetians were the only people who had thoroughly sympa-thized with the Arabs in this respect, I referred, first, to their intense love of color, which led them to lavish the most ex-pensive decorations on ordinary dwelling-houses; and, sec-ondly, to that perfection of the color-instinct in them, which enabled them to render whatever they did, in this kind, as just in principle as it was gorgeous in appliance. It is this principle of theirs, as distinguished from that of the Northern builders, which we have finally to examine. § xliv. In the second chapter of the first volume, it was noticed that the architect of Bourges Cathedral liked haw-thorn, and that the porch of his cathedral was therefore dec-orated with a rich wreath of it; hut another of the predilec-tions of that architect was there unnoticed, namely, that he did not at all like grey hawthorn, but preferred it green, and lie painted it green accordingly, as bright as he could. The color is still left in every sheltered interstice of the foliage. He had, in fact, hardly the choice of any other color; he might have gilded the thorns, by way of allegorizing human life, but if they were to be painted at all, they could hardly he painted anything but green, and green all over. People would have been apt to object to any pursuit of abstract harmonies of color, which might have induced him to paint his hawthorn blue. § xlv. In the same way, whenever the subject of the sculpt-ure was definite, its color was of necessity definite also ; and, in the hands of the Northern builders, it often became, in consequence, rather the means of explaining and animating the stories of their stone-work, than a matter of abstract deco-rative science. Flowers were painted red, frees green, and faces flesh-color; the result of the whole being often far more entertaining than beautiful. And also, though in the lines of the mouldings and the decorations of shafts or vaults, a 4cher and more abstract method of coloring was adopted (aided by the rapid development of the best principles of color in early glass-painting), the vigorous depths of shadow in the Northern sculpture confused the architect's eye, compelling him to use violent colors in the recesses, if these were to be seen as color at all, and thus injured his perception of more delicate color harmonies ; so that in innumerable instances it becomes very disputable whether monuments even of the best times were improved by the color bestowed upon them or the contrary But, in the South the flatness and comparatively vague forms of the sculptural bile they appeared to call for color in order to enhance their interest presented exactly the conditions 'which would set it off to the greatest advantage , breadth of surface displaying even the most delicate tints in the lights, and faintness of shadow coming with the most delicate and pearly greys of color harmony; while the subject of the design being in nearly all cases reduced to mere intricacy of orna-mental line, might be colored in any way the architect chose without any loss of rationality. Where oak4eaves and roses were carved into fresh relief and perfect bloom, it was neces-sary to paint the one green and the oilier red; but in portions of ornamentation where there was nothing 'which could he definitely construed into either an oik4eaf or a rose, but s mere labyrinth of beautiful lines, becoming here something like a leaf, and there something like a flower, the whole tracery of the sculpture might lie left white, and grounded with gold er blue, or treated in any other manner best harmonizing with the colors around it. And as the necessarily feeble character of the sculpture called for and was ready to display the best arrangements of color, so the precious marbles in the archi-tect's hands give him at once the best examples and the best means of color. The best examples, for the tints of all natural stones are as exquisite in quality as endless in change; and the best means, for they are all permanent. § xlvi. Every motive thus concurred in urging him to the study of chromatic decoration, and every advantage was given him in the pursuit of it; and this at the very moment when, as presently to he noticed, the naïveté, of barbaric Christianity could only be forcibly appealed to by the help of colored pict-ures : so that, both externally and internally, the architectu-ral construction became partly merged in pictorial effect; and the whole edifice is to be regarded less as a temple wherein to pray, than as itself a Book of Common Prayer, a vast illumi-nated missal, bound with alabaster instead of parchment, studded with porphyry pillars instead of jewels, and written within and without in letters of enamel and gold. § xlvii. LAW VII. That the impression of the architecture is not to he dependent of size. And now there is hut one final consequence to be deduced. The reader understands, I trust, by this time, that the claims of these several parts of the building upon his attention will depend upon their delicacy of de-sign, their perfection of color, their preciousness of material, and their legendary interest. All these qualities are independent of size, and partly even inconsistent with it. Neither deli-cacy of surface sculpture, nor subtle gradations of color, can be appreciated by the eye at a distance; and since we have seen that our sculpture is generally to be only an inch or two in depth, and that our coloring is in great part to be produced with the soft tints and veins of natural stones, it will follow necessarily that none of the parts of the building can be re-moved far from the eye, and therefore that the whole mass of it cannot be large. It is not even desirable that it should he so for the temper in which the mind addresses itself to con-template minute and beautiful details is altogether different from that in which it submits itself to vague impressions of space and size. And therefore we must not be disappointed, but grateful, when we find all the best work of the building concentrated within a space comparatively small ; and that, for the great cliff-like buttresses and mighty piers of the North, shooting up into indiscernible height, we have here low walls spread before us like the pages of a book, and shafts whose capitals we may touch with our hand. § xlvii. The due consideration of the principles above stated will enable the traveller to judge with more candor and justice of the architecture of St. Mark's than usually it would have been possible for him to do while under the influence of the prejudices necessitated by familiarity with the very differ-ent schools of Northern art. I wish it were in my power to lay also before the general reader some exempliflication of the .manner in which these strange principles are developed in the lovely building. But exactly in proportion to the nobility of any work, is the difficulty of conveying a just impression of it ; and wherever I have occasion to bestow high praise, there it is exactly most dangerous for me to endeavor to illustrate my meaning, except by reference to the work itself. And, in fact, the principal reason why architectural criticism is at this day so far behind all other, is the impossibility of illustrating the best architecture faithfully. Of the various schools of painting, examples are accessible to every one, and reference to the works themselves is found sufficient for all purposes of criticism ; hut there is nothing like St. Mark's or the Ducal Palace to be referred to in the National Gallery, and no faith-ful illustration of them is possible on the scale of such a vol-ume as this. And it is exceedingly difficult on any scale. Nothing is so rare in art, as far as my own experience goes, as a fair illustration of architecture; perfect illustration of it does not exist. For all good architecture depends upon the adaptation of its chiselling to the effect at a certain distance from the eye ; and to render the peculiar confusion in the midst of order, and uncertainty in the midst of decision, and mystery in the midst of trenchant lines, which are the result of distance, together with perfect expression of the peculiarities of the design, requires the skill of the most admirable artist, devoted to the work with the most severe conscientiousness, neither the skill nor the determination having as yet been given to the subject. And in the illustration of details, every building of any pretensions to high architectural rank would require a volume of plates, and those finished with extraordinary care. With respect to the two buildings which are the principal subjects of the present volume, St. Mark's and the Ducal Palace, I have found it quite impossible to do them the slight bit of justice by any kind of portraiture; and I abandoned the endeavor in the case of the latter with less regret, because in the new Crystal Palace (as the poetical public insists upon calling it, though it is neither a palace, nor of crystal) there will be placed, I believe, a noble cast of one of its angles. As for St. Mark's, the effort was hopeless from the beginning. For its effect depends not only upon the most delicate sculpture in every part, but, as we have just stated, eminently on its color also, and that the most subtle, variable, inexpressible color in the world,-the color of glass, of transparent alabaster, of polished marble, and lustrous gold. It would be easier to illustrate a crest of Scottish mountain with its purple heather and pale harebells at their fullest and fairest, or a glade of Jura forest, with its floor of anemone and moss, than a single portico of St. Mark's. The fragment of one of its archivolts, given at the bottom of the opposite Plate, is not to illustrate the thing itself, but to illustrate the impossibility of illustration. .... Daily, as the white cupolas rose like wreaths of sea. foam in the dawn, while the shadowy campanile and frowning palace were still withdrawn into the night, they rose with the Easter Voice of Triumph, -Christ is risen ; "' and daily, as they looked down upon the tumult of the people, deepening and eddying in the wide square that opened from their feet to the sea, they uttered above them the sentence of warning, -Christ shall come.,' § lxxi. And this thought may surely dispose the
reader to look with some change of temper upon the
gorgeous building and wild blazonry of that shrine of St.
Mark's. He now perceives that it was in the hearts of the
old Venetian people far more than a place of worship. It
was at once a type of the Redeemed Church of God, and a
scroll for the written word of God. It was to be to them,
both an image of the Bride, all glorious within, her
clothing of wrought gold ; and the actual Table of the
Law and The Testimony, written within and without. And
whether honored as the Church or as the Bible, was it not
fitting that neither the gold nor the crystal should be
spared in the adornment of it ; that, as the symbol of
the Bride, the building of the wall thereof should be of
jasper,* and the foundations of it garnished with all
manner of precious stones ; and that, as the channel of
the World, that triumphant utterance of the Psalmist
should be true of it,-" I have rejoiced, in the way
of thy testimonies, as much as in all riches? " And
shall we not look with changed temper down the long
perspective of St. Mark's Place towards the sevenfold
gates and glowing domes of its temple, when we know with
what solemn purpose the shafts of it were lifted above
the pavement of the populous square ? Men met there from
all countries of the earth, for traffic or for pleasure;
but, above the crowd swaying for ever to and fro in the
restlessness of avarice or thirst of delight, was seen
perpetually the glory of the temple, attesting to them,
whether they would bear or whether they would forbear,
that there was one treasure which the merchantmen might
buy without a price, and one delight better than all
others, in the word and the statutes of God |